Module 13 · Big life decisions
Rent or buy? The real cost of a home
How to compare renting and buying with the price-to-rent ratio and the costs that never come back, why time horizon decides, and why a bank's maximum is not an affordable amount.
This lesson is still locked
Pass the quiz in “Starting out: pocket money, first job, first budget” to unlock it.
Go to “Starting out: pocket money, first job, first budget”This module opens after you finish the previous one — or pass its module test if you already know it.
In this lesson
- Calculate and interpret the price-to-rent ratio
- List the costs of owning that never come back, and compare them with rent
- Show how time horizon and price growth change whether buying wins
- Explain leverage and why approval for a loan is a ceiling, not a recommendation
Nika and Jan, both 29, have found a flat for €250,000. A similar flat rents for €900 a month. Friends say, “Rent is throwing money away.” The bank says they could borrow more than they need. How should they think about renting or buying?
The price-to-rent ratio
The is the price of a home divided by a year of rent for a similar home. For the flat: €250,000 ÷ (12 × €900) = 23.1. A common rule of thumb says a ratio below about 15 favours buying and above about 20 favours renting. It is only a first screen.
Costs that never come back
A renter’s unrecoverable cost is the rent, plus contents insurance. An owner’s are:
- mortgage interest,
- maintenance, often about 1% of the home’s value a year,
- property charges and insurance,
- the opportunity cost of the deposit, which could have earned a return elsewhere,
- buying costs and, later, selling costs.
Only the part of a payment that repays the loan builds wealth. In Slovenia, the real-estate transfer tax is 2% of the value and the seller is the taxpayer for most second-hand sales; a new building within two years of first use is generally subject to 22% VAT instead.
The result depends on how long you stay:
| Horizon | Buyer’s net wealth | Renter’s net wealth | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 years | €73,200 | €77,900 | Renter |
| 5 years | €95,100 | €92,000 | Buyer |
| 10 years | €155,500 | €128,900 | Buyer |
| 10 years, flat value unchanged | €102,400 | €126,200 | Renter |
| 10 years, rent only €700 | €155,500 | €160,900 | Renter |
These numbers are an illustration, not a forecast. The lesson: time horizon, price growth and the rent level decide, and neither choice is always right. Taxes on gains are ignored. A comparison should count all costs on both sides.
Leverage, limits and non-money factors
With 20% down, a 10% price rise lifts your equity by 50%; a 10% fall removes 50%. Slovenia’s rules cap loan payments at 50% of net income and require at least €745 a month to remain after loans. These are ceilings. They are not advice: a payment you could still make at a higher interest rate, with some room left, is a better guide.
Stability, the freedom to renovate and school choices favour buying. Flexibility to move for work, and no repair surprises, favour renting. Both are legitimate.
Try it yourself
Check your understanding
10 questions. Get at least 8 right to unlock what comes next.